Skip to content

Requiring nurse educators to hold a degree in nursing education: Evidenced based results or an air of lateral violence?

2011 January 14
by Terri Schmitt

I can already feel myself getting in trouble for this post, because I am a nurse educator without a degree in nursing education… but I am unsure if I am willing to change that if need be. Honestly I am looking for some good, evidenced based feedback on this question/topic.

This past year there have been three monumental nursing activities that have pushed for increasing the education of nurses, revamping nursing education, and better preparation of nurse educators; the Tri-Council on nursing report, the printing of the Carnegie Foundation research on nursing education, and the I.O.M. report on the future of nursing.  While I agree with these I am seeing a nursing education movement that concerns me, for all nurses who teach in nursing education to hold a degree in nursing education.

Do not hear me wrong, I think nurses with graduate degrees in nursing education are critical to the education process.  However, I recently was made aware of one nursing program that openly told its faculty that they will not get promoted if they do not have a degree in nursing education. This proclamation was made after they had hired nurses with degrees in clinical areas like CNSs or NPs.  Those faculty members, some who are the most clinically competent that I have ever met, were basically told that they were second class citizens.  To me, and this is purely my observation, it had the feel of lateral violence.

To the evidence: Do we need to change how we are doing nursing education? Yes, change is good. However,  we do not need to throw the baby out with the bath water, but some good changes in education do need to be made.  Evidence so far provides that patient outcomes are better and nurses stay in practice longer with higher entry to practice degrees. The changes to nursing education need to happen to help support our students as they move forward into very challenging clinical areas.  Preparing our nursing faculty to better meet those challenges is always an excellent idea, but is the best faculty mix one that is only of one nursing degree? I am currently avidly and enthusiastically reading the recent publication of the Carnegie Foundation For the Advancement of Teaching, Educating Nurses: A call for Radical Transformation by Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day.  The majority of the book speaks to issues and brings forth data that I can whole-heartedly support, like emphasis on good nurse educators who also have a clinical practice to draw upon in the classroom.  Yet, the developing air of superiority of the nurse educator graduate degree as the only one suited for nursing education is somewhat concerning to me.

I cannot find current evidence that nursing students who have instructors with graduate nursing degrees in areas other than nursing education do more poorly in job performance, school, and on state board licensure exams.  If some of you out there have evidence to support this I would be genuinely interested in it.   Further, some of the best faculty I have ever worked with have held nursing degrees with emphasis in family practice, public health, adult health, women’s health, pediatrics, and administration and leadership.  Likewise, I could argue that some of the poorest nurse educators have been ones with degrees in nursing education.  In fact, given the complexity of health care and the vast expansion of knowledge, one might argue that the best mix of nursing faculty would be a group that had diverse nursing degree backgrounds so that each person’s weaknesses could be supported with the strengths of the other.

I would go a step further and argue that disciplines like history, chemistry, and math do not require their faculty to have a degree in education to teach undergraduates…  What was that you said? Why,… no those professions are not ‘hands on’ like nursing… O.K. so let’s look at other ‘hands on’ professions.  Do physicians, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, pharmacists, and the like require their faculty to have degrees in education to teach? Rather, do they seek out a faculty set that are diverse in experience and background to provide thorough education in all aspects of their programs?

From what I have learned in nursing education I am concerned that either we are making this requirement for one or more of the following reasons (Some tongue and cheek, some honest): 1. We throw nursing faculty, like students, right in and then eat them alive or talk about them in the break room if they do not do well starting out instead of supporting them.  2.  Nursing education and curriculum design has truly become so complex that no one without a degree in nursing education can figure it out.  3.  The nurses we are hiring to educate our students, no matter their degree, really are not doing a very good job and the only way to remedy that is to require that they all hold the same graduate degree.  4. Educators really are too far removed from practice and need some way to feel good about the knowledge they do hold. OR, 5.  Students who come out of programs where the faculty all hold degrees in nursing education are much better nurses.

The way I see it we have a golden opportunity here with the push for change and advanced education to build some excellent places for nursing education.  Places where students are supported, encouraged to critically think, encouraged to have open/safe discussions that explore topics like bedside manner, ethics, communication, culture, spirituality, technology, and sciences.  We can create the best future clinicians the world has ever seen but to do this we must have competent and complementing teams of nursing faculty.  I am excited at the soon to be prospect of many new practitioners with doctorate of nursing practice degrees as NP’s move into this education mode.  I have thought all along that these nurses would also be a HUGE benefit to the basic nursing education programs, because advanced clinical degrees at the doctorate level would assist programs in their development and fostering of student use of evidenced based practice knowledge, clinical skills, and critical thinking.  With this push for change in education, which is wonderful to say the least, I was hoping to see more unity among nurses instead of greater divides.

It seems that I might be wrong and that the best nurse educators are ones who have a degree in nursing education.  Hmmmm…. looks like I and several others had better consider other options in nursing because I may not be qualified to teach.  It may be a good thing I can put my PhD to use in other areas.

Opinions or thoughts?

  • http://thestorygirlbookreviews.blogspot.com Lorren

    While I think nurses with nurse education degrees are important to the education process, I would argue that as there are so many different facets of nursing, we need people with different backgrounds in order to give a more complete education.

  • http://torontoemerg.wordpress.com TorontoEmerg

    The thing I love about you and your blog is that you always and often give me a ton to chew over — there seems to be a synergistic thing happening. Which is to say, there’s a blog post gestating from me —- probably to be born next week!

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Well my blog posts are sparse and are often just my rantings about injustice. I will look forward, with great anticipation, to what ever is being ‘gestated’ in your vast gray matter. Thanks for reading my posts and for maintaining the best blog in nursing on the net.

  • Gabe

    I disagree with having to have an nursing education degree. There is already an extreme shortage of nursing faculty this will just make the shortage that much greater. Rather I would like the requirement of nurse educators to still practice actively in direct patient care even if it is just one day a month. Having nursing instructors who have not been in clinical practice for 10 years or more are more likely to be out of touch with todays technology and current pressures on nurses.

  • Jen B

    Terri – I agree with you that not all nurse educators need to have their MSN in nurse education. However, I think it benefits the educator and the student for the educator to have some training in teaching/learning strategies, evaluation, and learning tools. I am currently finishing my MSN in nursing education. I had transferred to another institution for 1 semester – away from the educator track to a general MSN – did not like it so I transferred back. I have been teaching as an adjunct faculty member for approximately 3 years now. I have spoken with many nursing instructors from various backgrounds. Many have their masters or PhDs in nursing – not nursing education. Many have shared with me that they wish they would have taken some courses or extra training in the aforementioned areas. I think we can all share with one another to expand all of our expertise.
    I also agree with you in the regard of nurses eating their young. When will be get over this terrible practice? We all have the same goal – to help educate, inspire, and lead the next group of nursing professionals to their careers. . . we should focus on how to do that better instead of focusing on who can pee further (sorry for that reference).

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Thanks for reading Jen. Sorry for the delay in approval. I agree with you. Lateral violence within the profession is one of our major obstacles.

  • Natasha Hubbard Murdoch

    Great post! I had heard about the suggestion of having faculty take an degree in education from a colleague who supported the idea. I agree with the comment from Gabe that the suggestion is curious because it takes time from faculty to become expert educators.

    I do agree that there are varying degress of strengths in all educators. But I also agree that strengths can only be promoted with mentorship, retention, teamwork and promoting continuing competence (quality assurance?).

    Our program is currently designing new curriculum and I’m pleased to know that our interprofessional courses match the suggestions of the Future of Nursing report. Since I am currently one of few faculty creating IP experiences for our students in our program, I know how much work is involved in marketing, coordinating, designing and delivering unique strategies for diverse professional students. I have created my own education degree – I learn strategies on the fly (testing and flopping in front of 200 students just to see), maintain certification in two specialities to validate that I should be teaching this stuff, and engage in research.

    So, I agree with you and don’t…in my last few years of teaching, I’ve had students in long term care, rehabilitation, oncology, orthopedics, and acute psychiatry. I find that keeps me up-to-date with practice. Becoming an expert educator takes all my time. Nurses cannot BE everything. And THAT is the scope of practice question that has plagued nurses for all time and maybe a reason why new nurses, to any practice or education setting feel pressured to know everything and do everything!

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Thanks for reading Natasha – I really appreciate your well thought out comments. I also agree that striving to be experts at what we do, practice area, is vital and that all nurse educators need to continue striving for that!

  • Pingback: Best In Nurse Blogs: Burnout Edition | The Millionaire Nurse Blog

  • http://mystrongmedicine.com Sean

    I’m on the fence about this one. I believe the lack of empirical evidence is due to the sheer newness of the idea. The advanced practice role is not only new (in comparison to the non-advanced degree/non-degree role), but it keeps changing and adapting to the whims of other professional influence.
    I believe, in order to improve on our current situation we should eventually make it a standard, but also there needs to be enough of a transition to allow for the delineation of this new standard.
    I speak only from my own experiences with the imposed and looming demands of NP’s and the newly acquired DNP education. As well as my own interest in becoming an educator later in my career.
    Maybe there needs to be a transitional program of some type to laterally transfer? I wish I had the answer.

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Sean – thanks for reading and the comments. While I think that nursing education and the mechanics of running a program, obtaining accreditation, etc… is a specialized knowledge set I am still not sure that requiring every graduate prepared nurse who teaches to hold a degree in nursing education is a wise idea. My fear is that we will loose our expert clinicians and area specialists that enhance the clinical knowledge of our programs.
      Your point remains a good one though. I may have to reconsider my position.

  • swoolf

    I have found this blog very enlightning. As a nurse educator, with both a Masters in nursing and Bioethics, and presently completing an EdD in higher education with a focus on interprofessional education in health care, I believe having a sound foundation in teaching and learning principles is important. I do believe there are benefits to having some educational courses in teaching when facilitating undergraduate nurses’ learning.

    I recommend that everyone read the Carnegie Foundation For the Advancement of Teaching, Educating Nurses: A call for Radical Transformation by Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day and the recent IOM and RWJF, The Future of Nursing Report. The challenges of the 21st century and beyond calls forth a workforce that comprises individuals who caring, compassionate, and competent. Individuals who work as a team, communicate, collaborate to give safe patient care.

    We must go beyond the silo of nursing!

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Thank you so much for reading! Your comment was well worded and thoughtful. I agree, we must be interdisciplinary and also seek to know more about how to best educate nurses in an ever changing and fast-paced health care arena. I have found gentle encouragement, support, and openly embracing specialty areas while seeking new knowledge (along with genuine enthusiasm and curiosity on the part of the faculty) have been the best environments for taking faculty to the ‘next level’ in teaching.

  • Mary

    I am on the fence…I can see your point and agree that we need clinical experts. However, these clinical degrees do not prepare clinicians how to teach, how to engage learners, how to promote active participation, choose appropriate methodologies, design for transfer of learning, and evaluation techniques. However, I am also a clinical expert, certified in both geriatrics and medical surgical nursing. That being said, I also agree this should not be mandated. I work in staff development and do hold a nursing education degree. Additionally, I am pursuing my EdD. This topic actually going to be my doctoral study! I am going to look at how nurse educators teach – particularly whether they are utilizing best practices in adult education. We will see how this all plays out. Even still, would you consider advocating for a course in adult education within these clinical degrees? As nurses, we are all teachers…whether it is patients or future generations of nurses. I look forward to your reply. Thanks!

    Mary Curran, RN-BC, MSN

    • http://nursestory.com Terri Schmitt

      Mary – Thanks for reading and I see your point. Yes, as nurses we are all teachers at some time and it is important for nurse educators to know these things. I would counter with the question, do history teachers take courses in education, physics professors, statisticians? What makes them prepared to teach? Many of my best instructors had no training what so ever in nursing education. Although the knowledge is beneficial for accreditation standards, creating exams that assist students in learning to take tests like NCLEX, and meeting certain academic quotas or guidelines, the other biggest advantage is design of online courses and good seated courses. I believe that institutions of higher learning in nursing need a good mix and perhaps assistance or continuing education from the nurse educators in a faculty group to assist them, much the same way that a WHNP might advise the content of a women’s health course. A good faculty mix would include… nurse anthropologists, nurse informaticists, medical surgical nurses, nurse administrators, nurse educators, nurse clinicians, nurses with degrees in public health, etc. I think if you survey the students in school they might give you a very similar answer.
      Your dissertation work sounds fascinating! Keep us posted on how it goes.